Institutional authority & causal evidence
Institutional authority & causal evidence
Who Gets to Put Pride on the Field?
Who can authorize a match-day display?
Work the news desk for Seattle’s 2026 World Cup match between Egypt and Iran. Follow who can make each decision, weigh competing explanations for what happened, and compare the evidence with the 2022 OneLove armband dispute.
Choose For Class at the start. Enter your name and, if you wish, your class or section. Finish the responses and checks to open your report.
Choose Download Class PDF in your finished report. If needed, use Print or save as PDF. Open the PDF to check your name and responses, then upload it to Canvas.
To pause or change devices, open Save & resume and download a JSON backup. Use the same activity and mode to restore it.
What you can explore
- Separate local celebrations, stadium access, and approval of what happens on the field.
- Distinguish direct observations, attributed claims, written rules, and records of decisions.
- Compare plausible explanations using evidence that could establish a plan change and what caused it.
- Apply the same evidentiary standard to Seattle and Qatar while comparing institutional leverage.
Guides & downloads
What the model leaves open
The report follows the evidence available in the game. Treat attributed accounts of plans, warnings, and reasons as claims with identifiable sources.
AFTERWARD, THINK ABOUT
Which institution could make a Pride event happen outside the stadium? Which approval mattered for activity on the field?
Teaching this activity Debrief, assessment & assignment draft
Bring it back to the room
- Which institution could make a Pride event happen outside the stadium? Which approval mattered for activity on the field?
- What is the smallest piece of new evidence that would let you say an approved plan changed? What else would you need to give a cause?
- Why might a threatened sporting sanction change a decision when a fine would be acceptable? Who bears each cost?
What to assess
Grade the five case responses. The initial Seattle judgment and Qatar forecast are formative checkpoints. Use the keyed checks and selected sources to locate evidence for the written claims.
Read the complete teaching guide →Syllabus description, rubric & printable companion →
Prepare an assignment to share.
Edit this text, then copy it into Canvas or your course website. These edits stay in this tab.
Syllabus description & discussion prompts
Syllabus description
Work the news desk for Seattle’s 2026 World Cup match between Egypt and Iran. Follow who can make each decision, weigh competing explanations for what happened, and compare the evidence with the 2022 OneLove armband dispute. Students produce a case report with source selections, a travel check, a fact-check, and a qatar comparison.
Questions for a discussion board or class debrief
- Which institution could make a Pride event happen outside the stadium? Which approval mattered for activity on the field?
- What is the smallest piece of new evidence that would let you say an approved plan changed? What else would you need to give a cause?
- Why might a threatened sporting sanction change a decision when a fine would be acceptable? Who bears each cost?